lundi 2 mars 2015

Motivation for review


Reviewing an article in your field is an interesting and rewarding experience. Any scientist has, of course, a moral obligation for reviewing other people's work just like he has his/her own work reviewed.


That being said, it's a very time consuming process and it would be nice if you could get some credit for it. Back in ye olde days of print journals, the editorial board and associate editors would be listed in the front pages so that was a form of credit. Nowadays however, with articles being accessed individually online, the editorial board gets much less, if any exposure.


Should the editorial board/associate editors be listed alongside the authors in an article or is that not necessary?





Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire