I have done MCA and now I am working as a software developer. I want to open my start-up, actually I tried it but for the lack of good team I had to shut it down. I tried to took opinion from my friend some are saying work in industry for 3 - 4 years and then go for it. some are saying you can do it now. being more specific
I have completed my bachelors in computer science and now iam doing job as software developer.During my 4 years stay at the university i was an average student and concentrated more on theory to pass the exams and less on practical work(like properly understanding the architecture of computer,computer programming etc).One reason was that i was a bit slow then some of my other classmates to grab the concepts taught in class.And therefore i had to spend more time understanding them when i came back home.
Some problems with me regarding practical work now are that whenever i stuck in some problem(for example some programming error etc) i usually find it very difficult to solve it and take much more time then other people to get it done.As it is happening with me now at my job. I feel like iam not a computer guy. Because even after studying 4 years degree iam not a good problem solver.I like to study computer things but iam just unable to solve technical issues.
So my question is that should i pursue ms in computer science and work more hard and try to overcome my weaknesses or should i take admission in masters in some business program which a more theory oriented and non technical field.
Iam quite worried about my future so ur help will be appreciated.
PS: "and please dont say why didnt i left this bachelors in computer science when i knew i was weak in solving technical problems.Because i cant do anything now the degree is completed".
In a scientific journal paper, when something is briefly discussed in one section (e.g., Introduction) and want to say it is further discussed in the discussion section (which is usually the last section of the main text), which one is more appropriate? Or are there other standards? Discussion section here is just an example and could be any other section (e.g., Materials and Methods).
... is further discussed in the Discussion
... is further discussed in Discussion
Similarly,
(See Discussion for details)
(See the Discussion for details)
I'd like to cite the following articles from the Nature Publishing Group, but no authors are mentioned (as far as I can tell):
However, it's likely that it was written by one (or more) of Nature's editors. If, for example, I am using the BibTeX formatting system, how should I describe the author of the article? For example:
1. author={Nature} 2. author={Nature Publishing Group} 3. author={anonymous} 4. author={}
Or should I leave it blank (option 4)?
I am a math grad student who has completed the qualifying exams within my first two years. Lately, I have been taking a few non-core courses, which allows me to put most of my time on my own research. In one of these non-core courses, I received a low grade: B-. I certainly have the a good Cumulative Grade Point Average: 3.9 -- well above what is required for "normal progress".
Question: How important/serious is getting a grade below 3.0 in this one course at this point in a PhD program? Any feedback is much appreciated.
i am working in one college as an assistant professor in department of computer science and engineering in India. i have 10 years experience of teaching. i want to ask a question. can i take the G.R.E exam for P.hd in computer science. i did Master of computer science with 76%.
i have M.Sc.(computer science) degree with 76% . so with this percentage can i plan to give GRE exam or tofel for phd from outside india? am i eligible?
I am an academic with hoping for an offer at an oceania university. I want to know how common in this system to ask the university to give my spouse a job? It is common and often successful in the US universities, but I don't know in the oceania (which is the same as the British) system. Thanks, John
