What are the best tips for developing a framework to write a (systematic) review paper?

This is a meta-level question but most review paper are narrative the story of the field or problem, or summarize a large but focused body of literature. writers of such papers are usually senior level faculties with years of experience in the field. but it is not clear how these papers are being reviewed and what is the formalism behind accepting or rejecting such papers? so many of such papers lack to present a framework or criteria or dimension for the field(maybe due to complexity) but is there any effort targeted to develop reviewing skills for young researchers to follow?